Functional and anatomical analyses of active spinal circuits in a mouse model of chronic pain.

ABSTRACT: Decades of efforts in elucidating pain mechanisms, including pharmacological, neuroanatomical, and physiological studies have provided insights into how nociceptive information transmits from the periphery to the brain and the locations receiving nociceptive signals. However, little is known about which specific stimulus-dependent activated neurons, amongst heterogeneous neural environments, discriminatively evoke the cognate pain behavior. We here shed light on the population of neurons in the spinal cord activated by a painful stimulus to identify chronic pain-dependent activated neuronal subsets using Fos2A-iCreER (TRAP2) mice. We have found a large number of neurons activated by a normally nonpainful stimulus in the spinal cord of spinal nerve-ligated mice, compared with sham. Neuronal activation was observed in laminae I and II outer under heat hyperalgesia. A large number of neurons in laminae II inner were activated in both mechanical allodynia and heat hyperalgesia conditions, while mechanical allodynia tends to be the only stimulus that activates cells at lamina II inner dorsal region. Neuroanatomical analyses using spinal cell markers identified a large number of spinal inhibitory neurons that are recruited by both mechanical allodynia and heat hyperalgesia. Of interest, spinal neurons expressing calretinin, calbindin, and parvalbumin were activated differently with distinct pain modalities (ie, mechanical allodynia vs heat hyperalgesia). Chemogenetic inhibition of those activated neurons significantly and specifically reduced the response to the pain stimulus associated with the stimulus modality originally given to the animals. These findings support the idea that spinal neuronal ensembles underlying nociceptive transmission undergo dynamic changes to regulate selective pain responses.

Acute inhibition of acid sensing ion channel 1a after spinal cord injury selectively affects excitatory synaptic transmission, but not intrinsic membrane properties, in deep dorsal horn interneurons.

Following a spinal cord injury (SCI), secondary damage mechanisms are triggered that cause inflammation and cell death. A key component of this secondary damage is a reduction in local blood flow that initiates a well-characterised ischemic cascade. Downstream hypoxia and acidosis activate acid sensing ion channel 1a (ASIC1a) to trigger cell death. We recently showed that administration of a potent venom-derived inhibitor of ASIC1a, Hi1a, leads to tissue sparing and improved functional recovery when delivered up to 8 h after ischemic stroke. Here, we use whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology in a spinal cord slice preparation to assess the effect of acute ASIC1a inhibition, via a single dose of Hi1a, on intrinsic membrane properties and excitatory synaptic transmission long-term after a spinal cord hemisection injury. We focus on a population of interneurons (INs) in the deep dorsal horn (DDH) that play a key role in relaying sensory information to downstream motoneurons. DDH INs in mice treated with Hi1a 1 h after a spinal cord hemisection showed no change in active or passive intrinsic membrane properties measured 4 weeks after SCI. DDH INs, however, exhibit significant changes in the kinetics of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents after a single dose of Hi1a, when compared to naive animals (unlike SCI mice). Our data suggest that acute ASIC1a inhibition exerts selective effects on excitatory synaptic transmission in DDH INs after SCI via specific ligand-gated receptor channels, and has no effect on other voltage-activated channels long-term after SCI.

Near-Infrared Photobiomodulation of the Peripheral Nerve Inhibits the Neuronal Firing in a Rat Spinal Dorsal Horn Evoked by Mechanical Stimulation.

Photobiomodulation has analgesic effects via inhibition of nerve activity, but few reports have examined the effects on the spinal dorsal horn, the entry point for nociceptive information in the central nervous system. In this study, we evaluated the effects of laser irradiation of peripheral nerve axons, which are conduction pathways for nociceptive stimuli, on the neuronal firing in lamina II of the spinal dorsal horn of a rat evoked by mechanical stimulation with von Frey filaments (vFF). In order to record neuronal firing, electrodes were inserted into lamina II of the exposed rat spinal dorsal horn. The exposed sciatic nerve axons were irradiated with an 808 nm laser. The 26.0 g vFF-evoked firing frequency was inhibited from 5 min after laser irradiation and persisted for 3 h. Sham irradiation did not alter the firing frequency. Laser irradiation selectively inhibited 15.0 and 26.0 g vFF-evoked firing, which corresponded to nociceptive stimuli. Histopathological evaluation revealed no damage to the sciatic nerve due to laser irradiation. These results indicate that neuronal firing is inhibited in lamina II of the spinal dorsal horn, suggesting that laser irradiation inhibits Aδ and/or C fibers that conduct nociceptive stimuli.

Presynaptic Interactions between Trigeminal and Cervical Nociceptive Afferents Supplying Upper Cervical Lamina I Neurons.

Cervical and trigeminal afferents innervate neighboring cranial territories, and their convergence on upper cervical dorsal horn neurons provides a potential substrate for pain referral in primary headache syndromes. Lamina I neurons are central to this mechanism, as they relay convergent nociceptive input to supraspinal pain centers. Unfortunately, little is known about the interactions between trigeminal and cervical afferents supplying Lamina I neurons. Here, we used rats of both sexes to show that cervical and trigeminal afferents interact via presynaptic inhibition, where monosynaptic inputs to Lamina I neurons undergo unidirectional as well as reciprocal presynaptic control. This means that afferent-driven presynaptic inhibition shapes the way trigeminal and cervical Aδ-fiber and C-fiber input reaches Lamina I projection neurons (PNs) and local-circuit neurons (LCNs). We propose that this inhibition provides a feedforward control of excitatory drive to Lamina I neurons that regulates their convergent and cervical-specific or trigeminal-specific processing modes. As a consequence, disruption of the trigeminal and cervical afferent-driven presynaptic inhibition may contribute to development of primary headache syndromes.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Cervical and trigeminal afferents innervate neighboring cranial territories, and their convergence on upper cervical dorsal horn neurons provides a potential substrate for pain referral in primary headache syndromes. Lamina I neurons are central to this mechanism as they relay convergent nociceptive input to supraspinal pain centers. Here, we show that cervical and trigeminal afferents interact via presynaptic inhibition, where inputs to Lamina I neurons undergo unidirectional as well as reciprocal control. The afferent-driven presynaptic inhibition shapes the trigeminocervical Aδ-fiber and C-fiber input to Lamina I neurons. This inhibition provides control of excitatory drive to Lamina I neurons that regulates their convergent and cervical-specific or trigeminal-specific processing modes. Disruption of this control may contribute to development of primary headache syndromes.

Recording Network Activity in Spinal Nociceptive Circuits Using Microelectrode Arrays.

The roles and connectivity of specific types of neurons within the spinal cord dorsal horn (DH) are being delineated at a rapid rate to provide an increasingly detailed view of the circuits underpinning spinal pain processing. However, the effects of these connections for broader network activity in the DH remain less well understood because most studies focus on the activity of single neurons and small microcircuits. Alternatively, the use of microelectrode arrays (MEAs), which can monitor electrical activity across many cells, provides high spatial and temporal resolution of neural activity. Here, the use of MEAs with mouse spinal cord slices to study DH activity induced by chemically stimulating DH circuits with 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) is described. The resulting rhythmic activity is restricted to the superficial DH, stable over time, blocked by tetrodotoxin, and can be investigated in different slice orientations. Together, this preparation provides a platform to investigate DH circuit activity in tissue from naïve animals, animal models of chronic pain, and mice with genetically altered nociceptive function. Furthermore, MEA recordings in 4-AP-stimulated spinal cord slices can be used as a rapid screening tool to assess the capacity of novel antinociceptive compounds to disrupt activity in the spinal cord DH.

Processing of trigeminocervical nociceptive afferent input by neuronal circuity in the upper cervical lamina I.

ABSTRACT: Afferents from the C2 spinal nerve (SN) and trigeminal nerve (TN) innervate neighboring cranial territories, and their convergence on the upper cervical dorsal horn neurons represents neural substrate of pain referral in primary headache disorders. Unfortunately, little is known about trigeminocervical input to the major spinal nociceptive projection area lamina I. Here, we used ex vivo brainstem-cervical cord preparation for the visually guided whole-cell recording from the upper cervical lamina I neurons. We show that 50% of them receive convergent monosynaptic input from both nerves, whereas 35% and 11% of neurons receive specific supply from the C2 SN and TN, respectively. Altogether, 10 distinct patterns of synaptic input from the C2 SN and TN to lamina I neurons could be identified. Although stimulation of both nerves evoked excitatory/inhibitory responses, more numerous pure inhibitory inputs arose from the TN. We show that cervical and trigeminal nociceptors converge on to lamina I projection and inhibitory neurons. Thus, trigeminocervical input in lamina I is processed in both nerve-specific and convergent circuitries. Afferent convergence on to inhibitory interneurons serves as a feedforward mechanism balancing excitatory drive to projection neurons. Disruption of this balance may cause pain in primary headache syndromes.

The MRI-based 3D morphologic changes of knee meniscus under knee weight-bearing and early flexion conditions.

There are few studies investigate morphologic changes of knee meniscus in vivo mechanical loading and three-dimensions (3D) deformation and displacement of the whole meniscus between in vivo mechanical loading and unloading conditions are still unclear. To investigate the displacements and 3D morphological changes of the menisci under knee weight-bearing and early flexion conditions in healthy adults using a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-compatible loading device (a 3.0 T MR imaging system) combined with a newly developed 3D comparison technique. Fifteen healthy volunteers were recruited in this cross-sectional observational study. Each subject underwent MRIs of their dominant right knee in eight different scanning conditions using a 3.0-T MRI scanner with a custom-made MRI-compatible loading device. The knee meniscus images were 3D reconstructed, and dimensional comparisons were made for each meniscal model with baseline (0°-unloaded model). The morphologic changes of the meniscal-anterior horn (AH), body (BD), and posterior horn (PH) regions were expressed as mean positive and negative deviations. The displacements were further investigated, and the meniscal extrusions of different subregions were measured. The morphologic changing patterns of human meniscus under loading and flexions were presented using 3D chromatic maps. The bilateral menisci were generally shifting laterally and posteriorly in most flexion angles and were changing medially and anteriorly under fully extended knee loading conditions. The mean deviations were more significant with loading at 0° of knee flexion, while the PH region in the lateral side changed further posteriorly with loading in 30° flexion. Most of the differences were not significant in other flexion angles between loading conditions. The extrusion of meniscus's medial body was greater in full extension compared to any other flexing angles. Mechanical loading can significantly deform the menisci in knee extension; however, this effect is limited during knee flexion. Current study can be used as a reference for the evaluations of the integrity in meniscal functions.

Intrinsic burst-firing in lamina I spinoparabrachial neurons during adolescence.

A subset of glutamatergic interneurons in the neonatal spinal superficial dorsal horn (SDH) exhibits intrinsic burst-firing (i.e. 'pacemaker' activity), which is tightly regulated by persistent, voltage-gated Na+ channels and classic inward-rectifying K+ (Kir2) channels and downregulated over the course of postnatal development. Ascending lamina I projection neurons targeting the parabrachial nucleus (PB) or periaqueductal gray (PAG) can also display pacemaker activity during early life. However, the degree to which the ionic mechanisms driving pacemaker activity are conserved across different cell types in the spinal dorsal horn, as well as whether the intrinsic bursting is restricted to newborn projection neurons, remains to be elucidated. Using in vitro patch clamp recordings from identified lamina I spinoparabrachial neurons in rat spinal cord slices, here we demonstrate that adolescent projection neurons retain their ability to generate pacemaker activity. In contrast to previous findings in lamina I interneurons, pacemaker projection neurons possessed higher membrane capacitance, lower membrane resistance, and a greater Kir-mediated conductance compared to adjacent spinoparabrachial neurons that lacked intrinsic burst-firing. Nonetheless, as previously seen in interneurons, the bath application of riluzole to block persistent Na+ channels significantly dampened pacemaker activity in projection neurons. Collectively, these results suggest that intrinsic burst-firing in the developing dorsal horn can be generated by multiple combinations of ionic conductances, and highlight the need for further investigation into the mechanisms governing pacemaker activity within the major output neurons of the SDH network.

A subset of spinal dorsal horn interneurons crucial for gating touch-evoked pain-like behavior.

A cardinal, intractable symptom of neuropathic pain is mechanical allodynia, pain caused by innocuous stimuli via low-threshold mechanoreceptors such as Aß fibers. However, the mechanism by which Aß fiber-derived signals are converted to pain remains incompletely understood. Here we identify a subset of inhibitory interneurons in the spinal dorsal horn (SDH) operated by adeno-associated viral vectors incorporating a neuropeptide Y promoter (AAV-NpyP+) and show that specific ablation or silencing of AAV-NpyP+ SDH interneurons converted touch-sensing Aß fiber-derived signals to morphine-resistant pain-like behavioral responses. AAV-NpyP+ neurons received excitatory inputs from Aß fibers and transmitted inhibitory GABA signals to lamina I neurons projecting to the brain. In a model of neuropathic pain developed by peripheral nerve injury, AAV-NpyP+ neurons exhibited deeper resting membrane potentials, and their excitation by Aß fibers was impaired. Conversely, chemogenetic activation of AAV-NpyP+ neurons in nerve-injured rats reversed Aß fiber-derived neuropathic pain-like behavior that was shown to be morphine-resistant and reduced pathological neuronal activation of superficial SDH including lamina I. These findings suggest that identified inhibitory SDH interneurons that act as a critical brake on conversion of touch-sensing Aß fiber signals into pain-like behavioral responses. Thus, enhancing activity of these neurons may offer a novel strategy for treating neuropathic allodynia.

Presynaptic Inhibition of Pain and Touch in the Spinal Cord: From Receptors to Circuits.

Sensory primary afferent fibers, conveying touch, pain, itch, and proprioception, synapse onto spinal cord dorsal horn neurons. Primary afferent central terminals express a wide variety of receptors that modulate glutamate and peptide release. Regulation of the amount and timing of neurotransmitter release critically affects the integration of postsynaptic responses and the coding of sensory information. The role of GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) receptors expressed on afferent central terminals is particularly important in sensory processing, both in physiological conditions and in sensitized states induced by chronic pain. During the last decade, techniques of opto- and chemogenetic stimulation and neuronal selective labeling have provided interesting insights on this topic. This review focused on the recent advances about the modulatory effects of presynaptic GABAergic receptors in spinal cord dorsal horn and the neural circuits involved in these mechanisms.

Noninvasive measurement of sensory action currents in the cervical cord by magnetospinography.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain magnetic recordings of electrical activities in the cervical cord and visualize sensory action currents of the dorsal column, intervertebral foramen, and dorsal horn. METHODS: Neuromagnetic fields were measured at the neck surface upon median nerve stimulation at the wrist using a magnetospinography system with high-sensitivity superconducting quantum interference device sensors. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were also recorded. Evoked electrical currents were reconstructed by recursive null-steering beamformer and superimposed on cervical X-ray images. RESULTS: Estimated electrical currents perpendicular to the cervical cord ascended sequentially. Their peak latency at C5 and N11 peak latency of SEP were well-correlated in all 16 participants (r = 0.94, p < 0.0001). Trailing axonal currents in the intervertebral foramens were estimated in 10 participants. Estimated dorsal-ventral electrical currents were obtained within the spinal canal at C5. Current density peak latency significantly correlated with cervical N13-P13 peak latency of SEPs in 13 participants (r = 0.97, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Magnetospinography shows excellent spatial and temporal resolution after median nerve stimulation and can identify the spinal root entry level, calculate the dorsal column conduction velocity, and analyze segmental dorsal horn activity. SIGNIFICANCE: This approach is useful for functional electrophysiological diagnosis of somatosensory pathways.

Functional organization and connectivity of the dorsal column nuclei complex reveals a sensorimotor integration and distribution hub.

The dorsal column nuclei complex (DCN-complex) includes the dorsal column nuclei (DCN, referring to the gracile and cuneate nuclei collectively), external cuneate, X, and Z nuclei, and the median accessory nucleus. The DCN are organized by both somatotopy and modality, and have a diverse range of afferent inputs and projection targets. The functional organization and connectivity of the DCN implicate them in a variety of sensorimotor functions, beyond their commonly accepted role in processing and transmitting somatosensory information to the thalamus, yet this is largely underappreciated in the literature. To consolidate insights into their sensorimotor functions, this review examines the morphology, organization, and connectivity of the DCN and their associated nuclei. First, we briefly discuss the receptors, afferent fibers, and pathways involved in conveying tactile and proprioceptive information to the DCN. Next, we review the modality and somatotopic arrangements of the remaining constituents of the DCN-complex. Finally, we examine and discuss the functional implications of the myriad of DCN-complex projection targets throughout the diencephalon, midbrain, and hindbrain, in addition to their modulatory inputs from the cortex. The organization and connectivity of the DCN-complex suggest that these nuclei should be considered a complex integration and distribution hub for sensorimotor information.

Spinal astrocytes in superficial laminae gate brainstem descending control of mechanosensory hypersensitivity.

Astrocytes are critical regulators of CNS function and are proposed to be heterogeneous in the developing brain and spinal cord. Here we identify a population of astrocytes located in the superficial laminae of the spinal dorsal horn (SDH) in adults that is genetically defined by Hes5. In vivo imaging revealed that noxious stimulation by intraplantar capsaicin injection activated Hes5+ SDH astrocytes via α1A-adrenoceptors (α1A-ARs) through descending noradrenergic signaling from the locus coeruleus. Intrathecal norepinephrine induced mechanical pain hypersensitivity via α1A-ARs in Hes5+ astrocytes, and chemogenetic stimulation of Hes5+ SDH astrocytes was sufficient to produce the hypersensitivity. Furthermore, capsaicin-induced mechanical hypersensitivity was prevented by the inhibition of descending locus coeruleus-noradrenergic signaling onto Hes5+ astrocytes. Moreover, in a model of chronic pain, α1A-ARs in Hes5+ astrocytes were critical regulators for determining an analgesic effect of duloxetine. Our findings identify a superficial SDH-selective astrocyte population that gates descending noradrenergic control of mechanosensory behavior.

Circadian regulation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathic pain and the underlying transcriptomic landscape.

Growing evidence demonstrates circadian rhythms of pain hypersensitivity in various chronic disorders. In chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), agents such as paclitaxel are known to elicit chronic neuropathic pain in cancer patients and seriously compromise their quality of life. Here, we report that the mechanical threshold for allodynia in paclitaxel-treated rats exhibited a robust circadian oscillation, reaching the nadir during the daytime (inactive phase). Using Per2::LucSV circadian reporter mice expressing a PER2::LUC fusion protein, we isolated dorsal root ganglia (DRG), the primary sensory cell body for peripheral nerve injury generated hypersensitivity, and monitored ex vivo reporter bioluminescence. We observed strong circadian reporter rhythms in DRG neurons which are highly entrainable by external cues. Paclitaxel treatment significantly lengthened DRG circadian periods, with little effects on the amplitude of oscillation. We further observed the core protein BMAL1 and PER2 in DRG neurons and satellite cells. Using DRG and dorsal horn (DH; another key structure for CIPN pain response) tissues from vehicle and paclitaxel treated rats, we performed RNA-sequencing and identified diurnal expression of core clock genes as well as clock-controlled genes in both sites. Interestingly, 20.1% and 30.4% of diurnal differentially expressed genes (DEGs) overlapped with paclitaxel-induced DEGs in the DRG and the DH respectively. In contrast, paclitaxel-induced DEGs displayed only a modest overlap between daytime and nighttime (Zeitgeber Time 8 and 20). Furthermore, paclitaxel treatment induced de novo diurnal DEGs, suggesting reciprocal interaction of circadian rhythms and chemotherapy. Our study therefore demonstrates a circadian oscillation of CIPN and its underlying transcriptomic landscape.

Insights Into Spinal Dorsal Horn Circuit Function and Dysfunction Using Optical Approaches.

Somatosensation encompasses a variety of essential modalities including touch, pressure, proprioception, temperature, pain, and itch. These peripheral sensations are crucial for all types of behaviors, ranging from social interaction to danger avoidance. Somatosensory information is transmitted from primary afferent fibers in the periphery into the central nervous system via the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. The dorsal horn functions as an intermediary processing center for this information, comprising a complex network of excitatory and inhibitory interneurons as well as projection neurons that transmit the processed somatosensory information from the spinal cord to the brain. It is now known that there can be dysfunction within this spinal cord circuitry in pathological pain conditions and that these perturbations contribute to the development and maintenance of pathological pain. However, the complex and heterogeneous network of the spinal dorsal horn has hampered efforts to further elucidate its role in somatosensory processing. Emerging optical techniques promise to illuminate the underlying organization and function of the dorsal horn and provide insights into the role of spinal cord sensory processing in shaping the behavioral response to somatosensory input that we ultimately observe. This review article will focus on recent advances in optogenetics and fluorescence imaging techniques in the spinal cord, encompassing findings from both in vivo and in vitro preparations. We will also discuss the current limitations and difficulties of employing these techniques to interrogate the spinal cord and current practices and approaches to overcome these challenges.

Activation of α-adrenoceptors depresses synaptic transmission of myelinated afferents and inhibits pathways mediating primary afferent depolarization (PAD) in the in vitro mouse spinal cord.

Somatosensory afferent transmission strength is controlled by several presynaptic mechanisms that reduce transmitter release at the spinal cord level. We focused this investigation on the role of α-adrenoceptors in modulating sensory transmission in low-threshold myelinated afferents and in pathways mediating primary afferent depolarization (PAD) of neonatal mouse spinal cord. We hypothesized that the activation of α-adrenoceptors depresses low threshold-evoked synaptic transmission and inhibits pathways mediating PAD. Extracellular field potentials (EFPs) recorded in the deep dorsal horn assessed adrenergic modulation of population monosynaptic transmission, while dorsal root potentials (DRPs) recorded at root entry zone assessed adrenergic modulation of PAD. We found that noradrenaline (NA) and the α1-adrenoceptor agonists phenylephrine and cirazoline depressed synaptic transmission (by 15, 14 and 22%, respectively). DRPs were also depressed by NA, phenylephrine and cirazoline (by 62, 30, and 64%, respectively), and by the α2-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine, although to a lower extent (20%). We conclude that NA depresses monosynaptic transmission of myelinated afferents onto deep dorsal horn neurons via α1-adrenoceptors and inhibits interneuronal pathways mediating PAD through the activation of α1- and α2-adrenoceptors. The functional significance of these modulatory actions in shaping cutaneous and muscle sensory information during motor behaviors requires further study.

Primary afferent-driven presynaptic inhibition of C-fiber inputs to spinal lamina I neurons.

Presynaptic inhibition of primary afferent terminals is a powerful mechanism for controlling sensory information flow into the spinal cord. Lamina I is the major spinal nociceptive projecting area and monosynaptic input from C-fibers to this region represents a direct pathway for transmitting pain signals to supraspinal centers. Here we used an isolated spinal cord preparation to show that this pathway is under control of the afferent-driven GABAergic presynaptic inhibition. Presynaptic inhibition of C-fiber input to lamina I projection and local-circuit neurons is mediated by recruitment of Aß-, Aδ- and C-afferents. C-fiber-driven inhibition of C-fibers functions as a feedforward mechanism, by which the homotypic afferents control sensory information flow into the spinal cord and regulate degree of the primary nociceptive afferent activation needed to excite the second order neurons. The presynaptic inhibition of C-fiber input to lamina I neurons may be mediated by both synaptic and non-synaptic mechanisms, and its occurrence and extent are quite heterogeneous. This heterogeneity is likely to be reflective of involvement of lamina I neurons in diverse circuitries processing specific modalities of sensory information in the superficial dorsal horn. Thus, our results implicate both low- and high-threshold afferents in the modulation of C-fiber input into the spinal cord.

Spinal cord neural network interactions: implications for sympathetic control of the porcine heart.

Inherent and acquired factors determine the integrated autonomic response to cardiovascular stressors. Excessive sympathoexcitation to ischemic stress is a major contributor to the potential for sudden cardiac death. To define fundamental aspects of cardiac-related autonomic neural network interactions within the thoracic cord, specifically as related to modulating sympathetic preganglionic (SPN) neural activity. Adult, anesthetized Yorkshire pigs (n = 10) were implanted with penetrating high-density microarrays (64 electrodes) at the T2 level of the thoracic spinal cord to record extracellular potentials concurrently from left-sided dorsal horn (DH) and SPN neurons. Electrical stimulation of the T2 paravertebral chain allowed for antidromic identification of SPNs located in the intermediolateral cell column (57 of total 1,760 recorded neurons). Cardiac stressors included epicardial touch, occlusion of great vessels to transiently alter preload/afterload, and transient occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Spatial/temporal assessment of network interactions was characterized by cross-correlation analysis. While some DH neurons responded solely to changes in preload/afterload (8.5 ± 1.9%) or ischemic stress (10.5 ± 3.9%), the majority of cardiovascular-related DH neurons were multimodal (30.2 ± 4.7%) with ischemia sensitivity being one of the modalities (26.1 ± 4.7%). The sympathoexcitation associated with transient LAD occlusion was associated with increased correlations from baseline within DH neurons (2.43 ± 0.61 to 7.30 ± 1.84%, P = 0.04) and between SPN to DH neurons (1.32 ± 0.78 to 7.24 ± 1.84%, P = 0.02). DH to SPN network correlations were reduced during great vessel occlusion. In conclusion, increased intrasegmental network coherence within the thoracic spinal cord contributes to myocardial ischemia-induced sympathoexcitation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In an in vivo pig model, we demonstrate using novel high-resolution neural electrode arrays that increased intrasegmental network coherence within the thoracic spinal cord contributes to myocardial ischemia-induced sympathoexcitation.

Evoked Compound Action Potentials Reveal Spinal Cord Dorsal Column Neuroanatomy.

INTRODUCTION: The electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) is a measure of the response from a population of fibers to an electrical stimulus. ECAPs can be assessed during spinal cord stimulation (SCS) to elucidate the relationship between stimulation, electrophysiological response, and neuromodulation. This has consequences for the design and programming of SCS devices. METHODS: Sheep were implanted with linear epidural SCS leads. After a stimulating pulse, electrodes recorded ECAPs sequentially as they propagated orthodromically or antidromically. After filtering, amplification, and signal processing, ECAP amplitude and dispersion (width) was measured, and conduction velocity was calculated. Similar clinical data was also collected. A single-neuron computer model that simulated large-diameter sensory axons was used to explore and explain the observations. RESULTS: ECAPs, both animal and human, have a triphasic structure, with P1, N1, and P2 peaks. Conduction velocity in sheep was 109 ms-1 , which indicates that the underlying neural population includes fibers of up to 20 µm in diameter. For travel in both directions, propagation distance was associated with decrease in amplitude and increase in dispersion. Importantly, characteristics of these changes shifted abruptly at various positions along the cord. DISCUSSION: ECAP dispersion increases with propagation distance due to the contribution of slow-conducting small-diameter fibers as the signal propagates away from the source. An analysis of the discontinuities in ECAP dispersion changes with propagation revealed that these are due to the termination of smaller-diameter, slower-conducting fibers at corresponding segmental levels. The implications regarding SCS lead placement, toward the goal of maximizing clinical benefit while minimizing side-effects, are discussed. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: John Parker is the founder and CEO of Saluda Medical and holds stock options. Milan Obradovic, Nastaran Hesam Shariati, Dean M. Karantonis, Peter Single, James Laird-Wah, Robert Gorman and Mark Bickerstaff are employees of Saluda Medical with stock options. At the time the data was collected for the study, Prof. Cousins was a paid consultant for Saluda Medical. John Parker, Milan Obradovic, Dean Karantonis, James Laird-Wah, Robert Gorman and Peter Single are co-inventors in one or more patents related to the topics discussed in this work.

Methodology for quantifying excitability of identified projection neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, specifically to study spinal cord stimulation paradigms.

BACKGROUND: Using in and ex vivo preparations, electrophysiological methods help understand the excitability of biological tissue, particularly neurons, by providing microsecond temporal resolution. However, for in vivo recordings, in the context of extracellular recordings, it is often unclear precisely which type of neuron the tip of the electrode is recording from. This is particularly true in the densely-populated central nervous system, such as the spinal cord dorsal horn at both superficial and deep levels. NEW METHOD: Here, we present a detailed protocol for the identification of superficial dorsal horn spinal cord neurons that receive peripheral input and project to the brain, using multiple surgical laminectomies and the careful placement of electrodes. Once a superficial projection unit was found, quantification to electrical peripheral stimulation was performed using a Matlab algorithm to form a template of projection neuron response to controlled C2 stimulation and accurately match this to the responses from peripheral stimulation. RESULTS: These superficial spinal projection neurons are normally activated by noxious peripheral stimuli, so we adopted a well-characterised wind-up protocol to obtain a neuronal excitability profile. Once achieved, this protocol allows for testing specific interventions, either pharmacological or neuromodulatory (e.g., spinal cord stimulation) to see how these affect the neuron's excitability. This preparation is robust and allows the accurate tracking of a projection neuron for over 3-h. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Currently, most existing methods record from dorsal horn neurons that are often profiled based on their excitability to different peripherally-applied sensory modalities. While this is well-established, it fails to discriminate between interneurons and projection neurons, which is important as these two populations signal via distinctly different neuronal networks. Using the approach detailed here will result in studies with improved mechanistic understanding of the signal integration and processing that occurs in the superficial dorsal horn. CONCLUSIONS: The refinements detailed in this protocol allow for more comprehensive studies to be carried out that will help understand spinal plasticity, in addition to many considerations for isolating the relevant neuronal population when performing in vivo electrophysiology.